Forward — right wing / inside forward
| Finishing | Decision quality ◉ scout | Ball carrying | Pressing | Chance creation | Runs in behind ◉ scout | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Tarawa | 5.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 8.5 |
High involvement throughout — actions distributed evenly across both halves. Four progressive carries, three successful press actions (all in the first 30 minutes), two runs in behind resulting in touches. Carrying was the primary threat: five take-ons attempted, three completed. Tracked back to win possession on the edge of his own box at 78' — notable for a forward. Overall output well above average for the role in this league.
Noticeably quieter second half — 21 actions before the break, 10 after. Pressing remained effective early (three wins in the first 20 minutes) but intensity dropped visibly after 75'. Two progressive carries, both in the first half. Runs in behind were less frequent against a deeper defensive line. The gap between first-half output and second-half output is the clearest pattern: either a fitness ceiling or a response to trailing. Against the strongest opposition in the three-match sample, the physical tools were still evident but the decision-making under pressure was weaker.
Best overall performance. Actions evenly distributed — no second-half drop-off, still pressing at the 84th minute with the same intensity as the 12th. Five runs in behind in the opening 15 minutes, three without receiving the ball — but the defensive line dropped 15 yards to compensate, creating space for teammates. This is the attribute that only appears in full-match observation: the runs that don't result in a touch but reshape the game. Four progressive carries, three press wins. The missed header at 62' confirms aerial finishing as a genuine development area rather than bad luck.
Ball carrying in transition. Beats defenders with pace and directness. Comfortable receiving on the half-turn and driving forward. The most consistent threat across all three matches.
Runs in behind. Volume and quality both high. Importantly, the runs that don't result in a touch still disrupt the defensive shape — this is an attribute only visible from full-match observation.
Pressing intensity. Willing and effective in the first hour. Press wins per 90 (2.7) are strong for the position. Initiates press triggers rather than following them.
Mentality. Tracks back voluntarily, competes physically, responds well to setbacks within a game. Character indicators are positive throughout.
Final-ball quality. The gap between approach play and end product is the headline development area. Crosses, cut-backs, and final passes are behind the level of the carry that precedes them.
Decision-making under pressure. Tendency to take an extra touch or attempt one too many when a simpler option is available. Most pronounced away from home (Match 2) and when the first option is cut off.
Aerial finishing. The missed header in Match 3 was the clearest example, but aerial threat generally is below what the physical profile would suggest. Timing and technique rather than a lack of athleticism.
Late-game consistency. One match showed a visible energy drop after 75 minutes. Sample size is small, but worth monitoring — either a fitness ceiling or a temperamental response to losing positions.
Every action, in the minute it happened, unabridged. So the report can be checked against the footage.
Match 3 · Home · D 1–1 · 90' played · 38 actions
All assessments are based on full-match video footage, watched in real time with every on-ball and significant off-ball action logged to the minute using a structured tally sheet. Attribute scores (1–10) are graded against a position-specific rubric calibrated to the OFC Pro League standard. Per-90 statistics are derived from manual event capture across all matches watched — they are not sourced from any third-party data provider. Two attributes (decision quality and runs in behind) are marked as scout-only: they require human observation and cannot be derived from event data. Key moments (goals, big chances created and missed) include the scout's own written observations from the moment of play. Pattern summaries are generated from the full event log — every action, every minute — so the analysis reflects the complete match, not just the highlights. Every claim in this report can be checked against the source footage by timestamp.